{"id":3327,"date":"2025-07-12T10:47:48","date_gmt":"2025-07-12T17:47:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/?p=3327"},"modified":"2025-07-17T16:29:41","modified_gmt":"2025-07-17T23:29:41","slug":"chalcedonpodcast","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/chalcedonpodcast\/","title":{"rendered":"\ud83c\udf99\ufe0f The Council of Chalcedon: A Forensic Podcast Series"},"content":{"rendered":"<p data-start=\"301\" data-end=\"503\">Welcome to <em data-start=\"312\" data-end=\"333\">The Chalcedon Podcast Series<\/em>\u2014a historical audio series offering a session-by-session examination of the Council of Chalcedon, based on the official conciliar minutes and modern scholarly editions.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"814\" data-end=\"1061\">\ud83e\udded <strong data-start=\"817\" data-end=\"829\">Purpose:<\/strong><br data-start=\"829\" data-end=\"832\" \/>To provide listeners with a clear, documented account of the Council\u2019s decisions, procedures, and theological conclusions\u2014highlighting the reasons why the Oriental Orthodox Churches do not accept the Council of Chalcedon.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"814\" data-end=\"1061\"><strong>Note<\/strong>: <em>This page is still under construction. Podcasts are still being added\/revised.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<hr data-start=\"1390\" data-end=\"1393\" \/>\n<h2 data-start=\"1395\" data-end=\"1417\">\ud83d\udd0a Podcast Episodes<\/h2>\n<h3 data-start=\"1419\" data-end=\"1476\">Overview \u2013 Introduction<\/h3>\n<!--[if lt IE 9]><script>document.createElement('audio');<\/script><![endif]-->\n<audio class=\"wp-audio-shortcode\" id=\"audio-3327-1\" preload=\"none\" style=\"width: 100%;\" controls=\"controls\"><source type=\"audio\/mpeg\" src=\"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Chalice-or-Chaos_-Unpacking-the-Political-Reality-Behind-the-Council-of-Chalcedon.mp3?_=1\" \/><a href=\"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Chalice-or-Chaos_-Unpacking-the-Political-Reality-Behind-the-Council-of-Chalcedon.mp3\">http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Chalice-or-Chaos_-Unpacking-the-Political-Reality-Behind-the-Council-of-Chalcedon.mp3<\/a><\/audio>\n<p><strong data-start=\"1498\" data-end=\"1511\">Overview:<\/strong> Introduction<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h3 data-start=\"1419\" data-end=\"1476\">Session I \u2013 Opening Statements and Initial Tensions<\/h3>\n<audio class=\"wp-audio-shortcode\" id=\"audio-3327-2\" preload=\"none\" style=\"width: 100%;\" controls=\"controls\"><source type=\"audio\/mpeg\" src=\"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Chalcedons-First-Session_-Power-Plays-Political-Coercion-and-the-Seeds-of-Christian-Schism.mp3?_=2\" \/><a href=\"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Chalcedons-First-Session_-Power-Plays-Political-Coercion-and-the-Seeds-of-Christian-Schism.mp3\">http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Chalcedons-First-Session_-Power-Plays-Political-Coercion-and-the-Seeds-of-Christian-Schism.mp3<\/a><\/audio>\n<p data-start=\"1477\" data-end=\"1668\"><strong data-start=\"1498\" data-end=\"1511\">Overview:<\/strong> The Council convenes with imperial backing. From the outset, signs of pre-set narratives emerge, including resistance to reviewing the Acts of Ephesus II.<\/p>\n<hr data-start=\"1670\" data-end=\"1673\" \/>\n<h3 data-start=\"1675\" data-end=\"1713\">Session II \u2013 Procedural Barriers<\/h3>\n<audio class=\"wp-audio-shortcode\" id=\"audio-3327-3\" preload=\"none\" style=\"width: 100%;\" controls=\"controls\"><source type=\"audio\/mpeg\" src=\"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Chalcedon-Unveiled_-Power-Plays-and-the-Schism-of-451-CE.mp3?_=3\" \/><a href=\"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Chalcedon-Unveiled_-Power-Plays-and-the-Schism-of-451-CE.mp3\">http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Chalcedon-Unveiled_-Power-Plays-and-the-Schism-of-451-CE.mp3<\/a><\/audio>\n<p data-start=\"1714\" data-end=\"1889\"><strong data-start=\"1735\" data-end=\"1748\">Overview:<\/strong> Requests to read the decisions of previous synods are denied. The rules of engagement become clear: some evidence is welcome, some is not.<\/p>\n<hr data-start=\"1891\" data-end=\"1894\" \/>\n<h3 data-start=\"1896\" data-end=\"1943\">Session III \u2013 The Deposition of Dioscorus<\/h3>\n<audio class=\"wp-audio-shortcode\" id=\"audio-3327-4\" preload=\"none\" style=\"width: 100%;\" controls=\"controls\"><source type=\"audio\/mpeg\" src=\"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Chalcedons-Shadow_-The-Controversial-Trial-of-Dioscorus-and-the-Roots-of-Schism.mp3?_=4\" \/><a href=\"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Chalcedons-Shadow_-The-Controversial-Trial-of-Dioscorus-and-the-Roots-of-Schism.mp3\">http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Chalcedons-Shadow_-The-Controversial-Trial-of-Dioscorus-and-the-Roots-of-Schism.mp3<\/a><\/audio>\n<p data-start=\"1944\" data-end=\"2164\"><strong data-start=\"1965\" data-end=\"1978\">Overview:<\/strong> Dioscorus is deposed not for heresy, but for procedural reasons, including alleged refusal to appear and breach of communion with Rome. Anatolius of Constantinople would later affirm:<em style=\"color: #6f6f6f;\" data-start=\"2167\" data-end=\"2221\">\u201cDioscorus was not deposed on account of the faith.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<hr data-start=\"2223\" data-end=\"2226\" \/>\n<h3 data-start=\"2228\" data-end=\"2265\">Session IV \u2013 Shifting Standards<\/h3>\n<audio class=\"wp-audio-shortcode\" id=\"audio-3327-5\" preload=\"none\" style=\"width: 100%;\" controls=\"controls\"><source type=\"audio\/mpeg\" src=\"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Chalcedon-Session-4_-Unmasking-Ancient-Power-Plays-and-Theological-Injustice.mp3?_=5\" \/><a href=\"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Chalcedon-Session-4_-Unmasking-Ancient-Power-Plays-and-Theological-Injustice.mp3\">http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Chalcedon-Session-4_-Unmasking-Ancient-Power-Plays-and-Theological-Injustice.mp3<\/a><\/audio>\n<p data-start=\"2266\" data-end=\"2448\"><strong data-start=\"2287\" data-end=\"2300\">Overview:<\/strong> Previously condemned bishops\u2014including known supporters of Nestorian language\u2014are restored to office, raising concerns about doctrinal consistency.<\/p>\n<hr data-start=\"2450\" data-end=\"2453\" \/>\n<h3 data-start=\"2455\" data-end=\"2503\">Session V \u2013 Definition Behind Closed Doors<\/h3>\n<audio class=\"wp-audio-shortcode\" id=\"audio-3327-6\" preload=\"none\" style=\"width: 100%;\" controls=\"controls\"><source type=\"audio\/mpeg\" src=\"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Council-of-Chalcedon_-The-Unanimous-Truth-or-a-Manufactured-History_.mp3?_=6\" \/><a href=\"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Council-of-Chalcedon_-The-Unanimous-Truth-or-a-Manufactured-History_.mp3\">http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Council-of-Chalcedon_-The-Unanimous-Truth-or-a-Manufactured-History_.mp3<\/a><\/audio>\n<p data-start=\"2504\" data-end=\"2711\"><strong data-start=\"2525\" data-end=\"2538\">Overview:<\/strong> The core Definition of Faith is drafted by a select few and presented for affirmation without debate. Most bishops simply sign, without recorded theological contribution.<\/p>\n<hr data-start=\"2713\" data-end=\"2716\" \/>\n<h3 data-start=\"2718\" data-end=\"2762\">Session VI \u2013 Signatures Under Pressure<\/h3>\n<audio class=\"wp-audio-shortcode\" id=\"audio-3327-7\" preload=\"none\" style=\"width: 100%;\" controls=\"controls\"><source type=\"audio\/mpeg\" src=\"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Council-of-Chalcedon_-How-One-Session-Sparked-a-Centuries-Long-Christian-Schism.mp3?_=7\" \/><a href=\"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Council-of-Chalcedon_-How-One-Session-Sparked-a-Centuries-Long-Christian-Schism.mp3\">http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Council-of-Chalcedon_-How-One-Session-Sparked-a-Centuries-Long-Christian-Schism.mp3<\/a><\/audio>\n<p data-start=\"2763\" data-end=\"2949\"><strong data-start=\"2784\" data-end=\"2797\">Overview:<\/strong> The Council reaches its climax amid imperial expectations and pressure. The resulting definition becomes a dividing line in Christian history.<\/p>\n<hr data-start=\"2951\" data-end=\"2954\" \/>\n<h3 data-start=\"2956\" data-end=\"2998\">Session VII \u2013 Juvenal of Jerusalem<\/h3>\n<audio class=\"wp-audio-shortcode\" id=\"audio-3327-8\" preload=\"none\" style=\"width: 100%;\" controls=\"controls\"><source type=\"audio\/mpeg\" src=\"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Chalcedons-Unjust-Legacy_-Power-Plays-and-the-Oriental-Orthodox-Divide.mp3?_=8\" \/><a href=\"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Chalcedons-Unjust-Legacy_-Power-Plays-and-the-Oriental-Orthodox-Divide.mp3\">http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Chalcedons-Unjust-Legacy_-Power-Plays-and-the-Oriental-Orthodox-Divide.mp3<\/a><\/audio>\n<p data-start=\"2999\" data-end=\"3181\"><strong data-start=\"3020\" data-end=\"3033\">Overview:<\/strong> A look at Chalcedon&#8217;s Session VII, where the strategic rehabilitation of Juvenal of Jerusalem exposes the council&#8217;s political machinations and the seeds of the Oriental Orthodox schism.<\/p>\n<hr data-start=\"3183\" data-end=\"3186\" \/>\n<h3 data-start=\"3188\" data-end=\"3224\">Session VIII &#8211; Theodoret of Cyrus<\/h3>\n<audio class=\"wp-audio-shortcode\" id=\"audio-3327-9\" preload=\"none\" style=\"width: 100%;\" controls=\"controls\"><source type=\"audio\/mpeg\" src=\"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Chalcedons-Courtroom_-Unpacking-the-Political-_Autopsy_-of-Christianitys-Great-Schism.mp3?_=9\" \/><a href=\"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Chalcedons-Courtroom_-Unpacking-the-Political-_Autopsy_-of-Christianitys-Great-Schism.mp3\">http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Chalcedons-Courtroom_-Unpacking-the-Political-_Autopsy_-of-Christianitys-Great-Schism.mp3<\/a><\/audio>\n<p data-start=\"3225\" data-end=\"3407\"><strong data-start=\"3246\" data-end=\"3259\">Overview:<\/strong> Final confirmations, formalities, and the canonization of decisions that would deepen the split with the non-Chalcedonian churches for generations.<\/p>\n<hr data-start=\"3409\" data-end=\"3412\" \/>\n<h3 data-start=\"3188\" data-end=\"3224\">Session IX &#8211; IBas of Edessa<\/h3>\n<audio class=\"wp-audio-shortcode\" id=\"audio-3327-10\" preload=\"none\" style=\"width: 100%;\" controls=\"controls\"><source type=\"audio\/mpeg\" src=\"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Chalcedons-Cover-Up_-How-Politics-Trumped-Theology-in-Bishop-Ibass-Rehabilitation.mp3?_=10\" \/><a href=\"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Chalcedons-Cover-Up_-How-Politics-Trumped-Theology-in-Bishop-Ibass-Rehabilitation.mp3\">http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Chalcedons-Cover-Up_-How-Politics-Trumped-Theology-in-Bishop-Ibass-Rehabilitation.mp3<\/a><\/audio>\n<p><strong>Overview:<\/strong> The podcast provides a forensic analysis of Chalcedon&#8217;s Session Nine, revealing procedural inconsistency, doctrinal injustice, and biased actions against Dioscorus and in favor of Ibas,<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h3 data-start=\"3188\" data-end=\"3224\">Session X &#8211; Ibas of Edessa<\/h3>\n<audio class=\"wp-audio-shortcode\" id=\"audio-3327-11\" preload=\"none\" style=\"width: 100%;\" controls=\"controls\"><source type=\"audio\/mpeg\" src=\"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Chalcedons-Contradictions_-Unpacking-the-Politics-Power-and-Shifting-Truths-of-Early-Christian-Orthodoxy.mp3?_=11\" \/><a href=\"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Chalcedons-Contradictions_-Unpacking-the-Politics-Power-and-Shifting-Truths-of-Early-Christian-Orthodoxy.mp3\">http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Chalcedons-Contradictions_-Unpacking-the-Politics-Power-and-Shifting-Truths-of-Early-Christian-Orthodoxy.mp3<\/a><\/audio>\n<p><strong>Overview:<\/strong> Restoration of a Nestorian: The transient &#8220;truth&#8221;<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h3 data-start=\"3188\" data-end=\"3224\">Session XI &#8211; Bassianus and Stephen<\/h3>\n<audio class=\"wp-audio-shortcode\" id=\"audio-3327-12\" preload=\"none\" style=\"width: 100%;\" controls=\"controls\"><source type=\"audio\/mpeg\" src=\"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Challenging-Chalcedon_-Power-Politics-and-the-Oriental-Orthodox-Divide.mp3?_=12\" \/><a href=\"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Challenging-Chalcedon_-Power-Politics-and-the-Oriental-Orthodox-Divide.mp3\">http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Challenging-Chalcedon_-Power-Politics-and-the-Oriental-Orthodox-Divide.mp3<\/a><\/audio>\n<p><strong>Overview:<\/strong> Chalcedon&#8217;s solution to a dispute over the bishopric of Ephesus &#8211; depose both bishops and start over.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h3 data-start=\"3188\" data-end=\"3224\">Session XII &#8211; DEfinition of Chalcedon &#8211; Required Assent<\/h3>\n<audio class=\"wp-audio-shortcode\" id=\"audio-3327-13\" preload=\"none\" style=\"width: 100%;\" controls=\"controls\"><source type=\"audio\/mpeg\" src=\"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Council-of-Chalcedon_-The-Pre-Scripted-Divide-That-Shaped-Christianity.mp3?_=13\" \/><a href=\"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Council-of-Chalcedon_-The-Pre-Scripted-Divide-That-Shaped-Christianity.mp3\">http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Council-of-Chalcedon_-The-Pre-Scripted-Divide-That-Shaped-Christianity.mp3<\/a><\/audio>\n<p><strong>Overview:<\/strong> The Definition is presented as a completed document, suggesting a predefined agenda where the majority of bishops were expected to simply ratify it<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h3 data-start=\"3188\" data-end=\"3224\">Session XIII &#8211; Suppresson and omission of information<\/h3>\n<audio class=\"wp-audio-shortcode\" id=\"audio-3327-14\" preload=\"none\" style=\"width: 100%;\" controls=\"controls\"><source type=\"audio\/mpeg\" src=\"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Council-of-Chalcedon_-Unpacking-the-_Forensic-Files_-of-Ancient-Power-Plays-and-Suppressed-Truths.mp3?_=14\" \/><a href=\"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Council-of-Chalcedon_-Unpacking-the-_Forensic-Files_-of-Ancient-Power-Plays-and-Suppressed-Truths.mp3\">http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Council-of-Chalcedon_-Unpacking-the-_Forensic-Files_-of-Ancient-Power-Plays-and-Suppressed-Truths.mp3<\/a><\/audio>\n<p><strong>Overview:\u00a0<\/strong>Information suppressed and omitted; canons made without conciliar knowledge\/assent<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h3 data-start=\"3188\" data-end=\"3224\">Session XIV &#8211; Athanasius of Perrhe<\/h3>\n<audio class=\"wp-audio-shortcode\" id=\"audio-3327-15\" preload=\"none\" style=\"width: 100%;\" controls=\"controls\"><source type=\"audio\/mpeg\" src=\"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Robber-Council-Aftermath_-Unpacking-Chalcedons-Double-Standards-and-Political-Splits.mp3?_=15\" \/><a href=\"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Robber-Council-Aftermath_-Unpacking-Chalcedons-Double-Standards-and-Political-Splits.mp3\">http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Robber-Council-Aftermath_-Unpacking-Chalcedons-Double-Standards-and-Political-Splits.mp3<\/a><\/audio>\n<p><strong>Overview:\u00a0 <\/strong>Like Dioscorus, he was deposed <i>in absentia<\/i> (at Antioch in 445 CE) for non-appearance. At Chalcedon, he was given provisional status; new investigation ordered with a path to potential reinstatement;<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><strong>Examples of the subordination of theological integrity to political expediency at Chalcedon<\/strong><\/p>\n<table style=\"width: 1188.18px;\">\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<td>Figure\/Council<\/td>\n<td>Initial Status\/Action<\/td>\n<td>Chalcedon&#8217;s Treatment<\/td>\n<td>Implied Reason\/Outcome<\/td>\n<td>Forensic Flag(s) Highlighted<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Dioscorus of Alexandria<\/td>\n<td>Condemned and deposed\u00a0<i>in absentia<\/i>\u00a0at Chalcedon (Session III) for non-appearance and misconduct.<\/td>\n<td>Condemned definitively\u00a0<i>in absentia<\/i>; charges shifted from heresy to procedural violations.<\/td>\n<td>Political adversary of the new imperial regime and Rome.<\/td>\n<td>Denial of a Fair Defense, Slander and\/or the admission of slander against him, Anomalies in Procedural Integrity, Pre-scripted Judgments or Outcomes, Subordination of Theology to Politics or Imperial Will<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Athanasius of Perrhe<\/td>\n<td>Deposed\u00a0<i>in absentia<\/i>\u00a0at Antioch (445 CE) for non-appearance; reinstated at Ephesus II (449 CE) by Dioscorus.<\/td>\n<td>Provisional status; new investigation ordered with a path to potential reinstatement; subjected to state laws if convicted of misdeeds.<\/td>\n<td>Aligned with the new imperial agenda, despite past misconduct and association with annulled Ephesus II.<\/td>\n<td>Anomalies in Procedural Integrity, Historical Contradictions, Double Standards, Admission of slander on his part, Subordination of Theology to Politics or Imperial Will<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Theodoret of Cyrrhus<\/td>\n<td>Condemned at Ephesus II for Nestorian views; prohibited from attending Antioch council by imperial edict.<\/td>\n<td>Rehabilitated (Session VIII) with no repentance, but only a reluctant anathematizing of Nestorius, despite objections.<\/td>\n<td>Political alignment with the new imperial order and Rome.<\/td>\n<td>Rehabilitation of Known Heretics without demonstrating that they repented, Pre-scripted Judgments or Outcomes, Subordination of Theology to Politics or Imperial Will<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Ibas of Edessa<\/td>\n<td>Condemned at Ephesus II for Nestorian views and misconduct.<\/td>\n<td>Rehabilitated (Sessions IX &amp; X) with no repentance, but only a reluctant anathematizing of Nestorius, despite objections..<\/td>\n<td>Political alignment with the new imperial order and Rome.<\/td>\n<td>Rehabilitation of Known Heretics without demonstrating that they repented, Pre-scripted Judgments or Outcomes, Subordination of Theology to Politics or Imperial Will<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<hr \/>\n<h2 data-start=\"3414\" data-end=\"3442\">\u00a0Supporting Documents<\/h2>\n<ul data-start=\"3443\" data-end=\"3592\">\n<li data-start=\"3443\" data-end=\"3505\">\n<p data-start=\"3445\" data-end=\"3505\">\ud83d\udcd8 <a href=\"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Acts_of_the_councle_of_the_Chalcedon.pdf\"><em data-start=\"3448\" data-end=\"3486\">The Acts of the Council of Chalcedon<\/em> (Price &amp; Gaddis)<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li data-start=\"3506\" data-end=\"3552\">\n<p data-start=\"3508\" data-end=\"3552\">\ud83d\udcc4 <a href=\"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/dioscorus\/\">Key Articles on Dioscorus and Chalcedon<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\ud83d\udcc4 <a href=\"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/steuphemia\/\">Miracle of St. Euphemia<\/a><\/li>\n<li data-start=\"3553\" data-end=\"3592\">\n<p data-start=\"3555\" data-end=\"3592\">\ud83e\uddfe Chronological Timeline of Events<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr data-start=\"3594\" data-end=\"3597\" \/>\n<p><span style=\"color: #353535; font-family: Oswald, sans-serif; font-size: 3rem;\">\ud83d\udcac Feedback &amp; Dialogue<\/span><\/p>\n<p data-start=\"3627\" data-end=\"3764\">We welcome respectful comments and insights. This series is a contribution to understanding\u2014not argument. Unity must be founded on truth.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Welcome to The Chalcedon Podcast Series\u2014a historical audio series offering a session-by-session examination of the Council of Chalcedon, based on&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3345,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":true,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[87],"tags":[130,131],"class_list":["post-3327","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-chalcedon","tag-chalcedon-podcast","tag-why-the-oriental-orthodox-rejected-chalcedon"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3327","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3327"}],"version-history":[{"count":33,"href":"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3327\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3339,"href":"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3327\/revisions\/3339"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3345"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3327"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3327"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3327"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}