{"id":3579,"date":"2026-03-26T00:53:02","date_gmt":"2026-03-26T07:53:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/?p=3579"},"modified":"2026-03-27T00:47:06","modified_gmt":"2026-03-27T07:47:06","slug":"ransom","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/ransom\/","title":{"rendered":"What Does \u201cRansom\u201d Mean in Scripture?"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Lord Jesus Christ says that the Son of Man came \u201cto give his life a ransom for many\u201d<\/em><\/strong> (Mark 10:45).<\/p>\n

Merriam-Webster defines ransom<\/strong> as \u201ca consideration paid or demanded for the release of someone or something from captivity.\u201d Merriam-Webster likewise defines redeem<\/strong> as \u201cto buy back,\u201d and also \u201cto free from captivity by payment of ransom.\u201d Those words invite an important question: what does ransom<\/strong> mean in Scripture?<\/p>\n

To answer that question, we should begin with explanation. The biblical language of ransom is richer than a bare synonym for deliverance. Deliverance is the result of ransom, but ransom is the means by which that release is obtained. In Scripture, ransom language often appears where there is a claim, a liability, a sentence, or a forfeiture\u2014and where release is obtained by some substitute, payment, or offered price.<\/p>\n

In this article, we will first clarify the basic meaning of the biblical terms. Then we will look at several Old Testament examples in which God requires a ransom, or in which something is redeemed by substitution\/exchange. Finally, we will see how these patterns find their fulfillment in Christ. This is important because Scripture\u2019s choice of words is not haphazard or merely flowery. When the New Testament repeatedly speaks not only of ransom but also of redemption, purchase, and being bought, it is selecting those terms for a reason.<\/p>\n

\n

1. The Basic Meaning of \u201cRansom\u201d<\/h2>\n

In English, a ransom is not merely a rescue. It is something given for release. A person may be rescued without ransom, but a ransom, by its nature, points to an exchange or price connected to release.\u00a0The Hebrew terms reflect this same richness.<\/p>\n

A. K\u014dpher<\/strong><\/h3>\n

One important word is \u05db\u05b9\u05bc\u05e4\u05b6\u05e8<\/strong> (k\u014dpher<\/em>). In passages such as Exodus 30, it refers to a ransom<\/strong> given for life. The idea is not simply that someone is saved, but that something is given in relation to that life being spared.<\/p>\n

B. P\u0101d\u00e2 \/ Pidyon<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Another important family of words comes from \u05e4\u05d3\u05d4<\/strong> (p\u0101d\u00e2<\/em>), with the related noun \u05e4\u05b4\u05bc\u05d3\u05b0\u05d9\u05d5\u05b9\u05df<\/strong> (pidyon<\/em>). These words carry the sense of redeeming<\/strong>, buying back<\/strong>, or securing release<\/strong>. They overlap with ransom language, though the emphasis often falls more directly on redemption or release by substitution.<\/p>\n

These terms are not always used in exactly the same way, but they belong to the same world of thought. In both cases, Scripture is dealing with more than a vague notion of rescue. It is dealing with release obtained through something given, paid, or substituted.<\/p>\n

This is also why the New Testament\u2019s frequent use of redeem\/redemption<\/strong> language matters. Even when the noun ransom<\/strong> itself is not used, the New Testament repeatedly uses related terms that still carry transactional force. The noun \u03bb\u03cd\u03c4\u03c1\u03bf\u03bd<\/strong> (lytron<\/em>, \u201cransom-price\u201d) occurs 2 times; the verb \u03bb\u03c5\u03c4\u03c1\u03cc\u03c9<\/strong> (lytro\u014d<\/em>, \u201cto redeem by paying a ransom\u201d) occurs 3 times; the noun \u03bb\u03cd\u03c4\u03c1\u03c9\u03c3\u03b9\u03c2<\/strong> (lytr\u014dsis<\/em>, \u201credemption\/ransoming\u201d) occurs 3 times; and \u1f00\u03c0\u03bf\u03bb\u03cd\u03c4\u03c1\u03c9\u03c3\u03b9\u03c2<\/strong> (apolytr\u014dsis<\/em>, \u201credemption, release effected by payment of ransom\u201d) occurs 10 times. Even \u1f10\u03be\u03b1\u03b3\u03bf\u03c1\u03ac\u03b6\u03c9<\/strong> (exagoraz\u014d<\/em>, \u201cto redeem, buy out\u201d) is used in salvation contexts such as Galatians 3:13 and 4:5. So while this article remains focused on the word ransom<\/strong>, it is important to see that the New Testament constantly reinforces the same basic idea through the language of redemption, purchase, and release by price.<\/p>\n

\n

2. The Census Ransom: A Price Given for Life<\/h2>\n

One of the clearest examples is found in Exodus 30:11\u201316<\/strong>. In that passage, God gives Israel a specific command for times when the people are counted in a census. Each man who is counted must give a half-shekel as a ransom for his life<\/strong> to the Lord, so that there will be no plague among them. In other words, this is not an incidental custom that arose later. It is a requirement God Himself lays down for the numbering of His people.<\/p>\n

This is important for several reasons. First, the text does not merely say that God delivers them. It says that each person counted must give a ransom for his life<\/strong>. The word used here is k\u014dpher<\/em>. The language is concrete and deliberate.<\/p>\n

Second, this ransom is given to the Lord<\/strong>. That matters. The text itself establishes a Godward direction. Here the Old Testament itself already gives us a clear example in which ransom language is directly related to something offered to God for someone’s life.<\/p>\n

Third, the context is not one of private crime, but of life standing exposed before God. The people are being counted, and Scripture treats this not as a morally neutral administrative act, but as something that requires acknowledgment that their lives belong to Him. The half-shekel is therefore not a casual fee. It is a solemn recognition that life is God\u2019s, and that man does not stand secure before Him on autonomous terms.<\/p>\n

Christ-centered meaning<\/h3>\n

The Fathers saw in this more than an ancient ritual. They saw a shadow of Christ. If each man under the old covenant required a ransom for his life, that pointed beyond itself to the true ransom who would be given for all. The half-shekel did not truly save the soul. It was a sign. Christ is the reality.<\/p>\n

That is why this passage is so useful in explaining biblical ransom. The text itself already shows that ransom is more than vague deliverance. It is something given for life<\/strong>, and given to God<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

\n

3. The Firstborn and the Levites: Redemption Because the Firstborn Belonged to God<\/h2>\n

A second major example is found in Exodus 13<\/strong>, Numbers 3<\/strong>, and Numbers 18<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

This section can seem obscure at first if one is not already familiar with the firstborn laws in Israel. The basic idea is this: after the Lord struck the firstborn of Egypt and spared the firstborn of Israel, He declared that the firstborn of Israel belonged to Him. Because He spared them, they were now specially consecrated to Him.<\/p>\n

Later, God appointed the tribe of Levi to stand in place of Israel\u2019s firstborn sons. In that sense, the Levites functioned as substitutes for the firstborn who otherwise belonged to the Lord in a special way. But the numbers did not match exactly. There were more firstborn sons in Israel than there were Levites to stand in their place. For that reason, the remaining number had to be redeemed with money. So the shekels were not an arbitrary donation, but a redemption payment to God for the excess firstborn who were not covered by the Levites.<\/p>\n

This is an especially illuminating passage because it makes the logic visible.<\/p>\n

    \n
  • God claims the firstborn as His own.<\/li>\n
  • The Levites stand in their place.<\/li>\n
  • Where the substitution does not cover all, redemption money is paid (to God).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    That money was not incidental. It was a redemption price for the excess firstborn because the Levites did not numerically cover all of them. In other words, the logic of substitution remained in force even where the substitute was insufficient in number: what the Levites did not cover had to be answered by a paid redemption price.<\/p>\n

    That is not a mere statement that the firstborn are \u201chelped\u201d or \u201cdelivered.\u201d It is a structure of claim, substitution, and payment to God for redemption<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

    Christ-centered meaning<\/h3>\n

    The symbolism here is rich. Humanity belongs to God, yet stands under a claim it cannot satisfy on its own. A substitute is needed. Under the old covenant, the Levites could serve in the place of the firstborn in a limited, typological way. But they were only shadows.<\/p>\n

    Christ is the true fulfillment. He is the One who fully answers what those partial substitutions could only represent. What the Levites were to Israel\u2019s firstborn in type, Christ is to His people in truth.<\/p>\n

    This also helps the reader understand why ransom cannot be reduced to \u201cdeliverance.\u201d The firstborn are not merely delivered in the abstract. A specific claim stands upon them, and that claim is addressed by substitution and even a financial payment to God (redemption).<\/p>\n

    \n

    4. The Firstborn Donkey: Redeemed by a Lamb or Put to Death<\/h2>\n

    Perhaps the clearest and most vivid example is found in Exodus 13:13<\/strong> and repeated in Exodus 34:20<\/strong>:<\/p>\n

    the firstborn donkey must be redeemed with a lamb; if it is not redeemed, its neck must be broken.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    The Hebrew verb here comes from p\u0101d\u00e2<\/strong>: the donkey must be redeemed<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

    This example is powerful precisely because it is so concrete. The donkey is an unclean<\/strong> animal. It cannot be offered as a sacrifice in the way a lamb can. Yet as a firstborn animal, it still falls under the Lord\u2019s claim. Therefore, two options remain:<\/p>\n

      \n
    • it is redeemed by means of a lamb,<\/li>\n
    • or it dies.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      That is the structure. There is no room here for reducing ransom or redemption to a vague rescue. The donkey is spared only because another life stands in its place.<\/p>\n

      Christ-centered meaning<\/h3>\n

      Christian readers have long seen the beauty of the symbolism here.<\/p>\n

        \n
      • The unclean donkey<\/strong> represents us: unclean, unfit, and unable to offer ourselves acceptably to God.<\/li>\n
      • The lamb<\/strong> represents Christ: clean, acceptable, and appointed by God.<\/li>\n
      • If the donkey is not redeemed by the lamb, it dies.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

        That is not an arbitrary illustration. It is a small enacted parable of redemption. We were the ones who deserved death. We were unclean and could not redeem ourselves. Christ, the true Lamb, was given so that we might be spared.<\/p>\n

        This is one of the most accessible Old Testament pictures of substitution. And because it is so simple, it is also devastating to the idea that redemption language means no more than \u201cGod helps us.\u201d No: the donkey lives because the lamb is given in its place.<\/p>\n

        \n

        5. Why These Examples Matter<\/h2>\n

        Taken together, these Old Testament passages teach several important truths.<\/p>\n

        A. Ransom is more than rescue<\/h3>\n

        In all three examples, the issue is not bare deliverance in the abstract. The issue is release obtained through something given, substituted, or paid.<\/p>\n

        B. God Himself is the One whose claim is in view<\/h3>\n

        In the census ransom, the ransom is given to the Lord<\/strong>. In the case of the firstborn, the firstborn belong to the Lord<\/strong>. In the case of the donkey, the firstborn still falls under the Lord\u2019s claim and must be redeemed.<\/p>\n

        This means that ransom language in Scripture cannot honestly be discussed as though God were absent from the transaction.<\/p>\n

        C. The pattern points to Christ<\/h3>\n

        These passages are not isolated curiosities. They prepare the reader for the New Testament.<\/p>\n

          \n
        • A ransom for life<\/li>\n
        • A substitute standing in the place of another<\/li>\n
        • Redemption because something belongs to God<\/li>\n
        • An unclean life spared by the death of a lamb<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

          All of this converges in Christ.<\/p>\n

          To these examples we may also add the offering of the ram in place of Isaac<\/strong> in Genesis 22<\/strong>. Isaac was spared because God provided a substitute. The ram dies, and the son lives. That scene is not identical in form to every ransom text, but it belongs to the same biblical world of exchange, substitution, and life preserved through another given in one\u2019s place<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

          \n

          6. To Whom Was the Ransom Paid?<\/h2>\n

          At this point, an obvious question arises: if ransom is a real category involving exchange, payment, or substitution, then to whom was the ransom paid?\u00a0The New Testament already tells us in Hebrews 9:14, Christ:<\/p>\n

          \u00a0Offered Himself without spot to God…<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

          Since Christ’s sacrifice to God and His ransom both pertain to his death on our behalf, the two are the same; His sacrifice itself is the ransom. The Old Testament\u00a0 examples help us understand this more fully:<\/p>\n

          In the census ransom<\/strong>, the half-shekel is explicitly given to the Lord<\/strong>. In the case of the firstborn<\/strong>, the firstborn belong to the Lord<\/strong>, and the redemption price answers that divine claim. In the case of the donkey<\/strong>, the text does not describe a monetary payment handed over to a visible recipient, but the entire act still takes place under the Lord\u2019s claim and according to His command: the donkey must be redeemed by a lamb offered to the Lord in its place, or it dies. In each case, God is not absent from the transaction. He is the One who establishes the claim, requires the redemption, and to whom the ransom, payment, or substitute is offered.<\/p>\n

          The point is simple and yet profound: as all human life falls under the sentence of death, it stands under God\u2019s claim. God Himself appoints the ransom, substitute, or redemption price by which that life is spared. Mercy prevails, and the truth of God’s sentence is upheld.<\/p>\n

          This is why St. Irenaeus can say that we became debtors to God<\/strong><\/em>, because it was His commandment that had been transgressed; and why St. Cyril of Alexandria can speak so directly of Christ offering Himself \u201cas a ransom to God the Father.\u201d<\/strong> The biblical and patristic pattern is therefore Godward.<\/p>\n

          7. Christ as the Fulfillment of the Pattern<\/h2>\n

          When the New Testament says that Christ gave Himself as a ransom, it is drawing upon an already established biblical context.\u00a0This is why the language of ransom\/redemption in the New Testament naturally stands alongside the language of sacrifice. Christ did not merely deliver us in some undefined way. He gave Himself. He was offered. He stood in our place. He paid our debt for sin. The old patterns were temporary and symbolic. Christ is the substance. The New Testament uses similar words that help explain and emphasize the ransom theme:<\/p>\n

          The Apostle Paul reminds us:<\/p>\n

          \u201cFor you were bought at a price; therefore glorify God in your body and in your spirit, which are God\u2019s\u201d (1 Corinthians 6:20).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

          To be bought at a price<\/strong> is not religious poetry. It is concrete purchase and ransom language. It tells us that our salvation is not merely deliverance from danger, but also a costly redemption. And significantly, Paul immediately connects that purchase to the fact that we now belong to God<\/strong>. That fits closely with the Old Testament patterns already discussed: ransom and redemption are not only about release from death or judgment, but also about belonging to the One who has rightful claim over life.<\/p>\n

          The Apostles John and Paul explain the mechanics of this “purchase” further.\u00a0St. John writes:<\/p>\n

          \u201cAnd if anyone sins, we have an Advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous; and He Himself is the propitiation for our sins\u201d (1 John 2:1\u20132).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

          The Greek word for propitiation in this verse is \u1f31\u03bb\u03b1\u03c3\u03bc\u03cc\u03c2<\/strong> (hilasmos<\/em>). In simple terms, Christ is the offering that deals with sin before God.\u00a0St. Paul makes the same point when he writes:<\/p>\n

          \u201cWhom God set forth as a propitiation by His blood, through faith\u201d (Romans 3:25).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

          Here the Apostle Paul uses the Greek word \u1f31\u03bb\u03b1\u03c3\u03c4\u03ae\u03c1\u03b9\u03bf\u03bd<\/strong> (hilast\u0113rion<\/em>), often translated propitiation<\/strong>. This word is related to the Old Testament mercy seat<\/strong> (Hebrew: \u05db\u05b7\u05bc\u05e4\u05b9\u05bc\u05e8\u05b6\u05ea<\/strong>, kapp\u014dreth<\/em>)\u2014the holy place where sacrificial blood was presented before God. In other words, both the Apostle John and the Apostle Paul are describing Christ as the God-appointed means by which sin is dealt with before God.<\/p>\n

          This helps us make an important connection with the Hebrew words we discussed earlier. K\u014dpher<\/strong> points to the ransom-price itself\u2014something given for life. The mercy seat<\/strong> (kapp\u014dreth<\/strong>) is the place where the blood of that atoning sacrifice is presented before God. The two words are not identical, because one refers to the ransom itself and the other to the place where the atoning blood is presented. Yet they belong together. They arise from the same broader Hebrew root family and belong to the same theological world.<\/p>\n

          In Christ the two meet. Christ is both the One who gives Himself as the ransom (K\u014dpher) and the true mercy seat (kapp\u014dreth) in whom that saving work is presented before God. Under the Old Testament shadows, the victim and the mercy seat were distinct: the blood was shed, and then it was brought to the God-appointed place of presentation. In Christ, however, the reality is greater. He is not only the k\u014dpher<\/strong> offered for us, but also the true kapp\u014dreth<\/strong>, because in His very person God has appointed both the ransom and the place where the ransom is effectual before Him.<\/p>\n

          St. Paul explains the same in a different way:<\/p>\n

          \u201cChrist redeemed us from the curse of the law, having become a curse for us\u201d (Galatians 3:13).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

          The Greek word translated redeemed<\/strong> here is \u1f10\u03be\u03b7\u03b3\u03cc\u03c1\u03b1\u03c3\u03b5\u03bd<\/strong> (ex\u0113gorasen<\/em>), a word that carries the sense of buying out or redeeming out from under something. At minimum, the verse contains both substitution<\/strong> and liberation from divine judgment<\/strong>: Christ takes upon Himself our curse of disobedience, and we are released from it.<\/p>\n

          This fits naturally with the Old Testament patterns already discussed. In the census ransom<\/strong>, a ransom is given for life so that the counted person is spared from plague (divine judgment). In the case of the donkey<\/strong>, the unclean firstborn is spared only because a blameless lamb stands in its place. In both cases, one life or payment answers what otherwise stood against another. In Galatians 3:13, the burden is not merely death in the abstract, but the curse of Divine law<\/strong>\u2014that is, the divine judgment attached to disobedience. Christ bears that curse in our place so that we might be free.<\/p>\n

          Thus, Christ was not using random or decorative language when He said that He would give His life as a “ransom”<\/em><\/strong>. The same is true when Scripture says that we were \u201cbought at a price.\u201d<\/em><\/strong> All of these expressions belong together. Christ is the ransom given for our release, the propitiation who deals with our sin before God, the true mercy seat in whom that saving work is presented, and the One who bears the curse of the law in our place. Scripture is therefore teaching us from several angles that Christ\u2019s saving work is a true ransom, redemption, propitiation, substitution\/exchange, and atonement accomplished through His self-offering to God on our behalf.<\/p>\n

          \n

          8. A Brief Note on Some Modern Reductions of \u201cRansom\u201d<\/h2>\n

          This is where some modern theological claims go wrong. Wanting to avoid any suggestion of exchange, substitution, payment, or Godward direction, they reduce \u201cransom\u201d to mean simply \u201cdeliverance\u201d from death. But the Old Testament does not allow that reduction.<\/p>\n

          The Old Testament does contain real examples in which ransom or redemption language emphasizes God\u2019s act of powerful deliverance with no payment or substitution made. Jeremiah 31:11<\/strong> says that the Lord \u201cransomed Jacob, and redeemed him from the hand of him that was stronger than he.\u201d Hosea 13:14<\/strong> says, \u201cI will ransom them from the power of the grave; I will redeem them from death.\u201d In passages like these, the emphasis falls on God\u2019s saving action\u2014His victory over a stronger enemy, oppressor, or even death itself.<\/p>\n

          However, the Bible does not use ransom language in only one narrow way. Sometimes the emphasis falls on a price, payment, or substitution. Sometimes the emphasis falls on the mighty act of deliverance accomplished by God. But this broader usage does not erase the more concrete one. It simply means that the biblical word-group has a range of use. And that is exactly why reductionism fails. One may not take passages like Jeremiah 31:11 or Hosea 13:14, where the emphasis is on deliverance from a stronger power, and then force every other ransom text into that same mold. Scripture itself will not allow that.<\/p>\n

          Indeed Christ delivered from death, but the means by which He did so are not devoid of the concrete meanings of “ransom” discussed earlier:<\/p>\n

            \n
          • In Exodus 30:12<\/strong>, the word is \u05db\u05b9\u05bc\u05e4\u05b6\u05e8<\/strong> (k\u014dpher<\/em>), a ransom-price given \u201cfor his life\u201d to the Lord.<\/li>\n
          • In the case of the firstborn<\/strong>, redemption involves substitution and even a financial payment to God.<\/li>\n
          • In the case of the donkey<\/strong>, redemption means that a lamb is given in its place, or else it dies.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

            So the issue is not whether Scripture sometimes uses ransom language more broadly. It does. The issue is whether those broader uses cancel or empty the more concrete ransom texts. They do not.<\/p>\n

            An analogy may help here. The English word judge<\/strong> can be used in more than one way. Someone may say, \u201cI judge that this is true,\u201d meaning I determine<\/em>, I assess<\/em>, or I conclude<\/em>. But that broader use of the word does not abolish its legal meaning. It does not nullify the existence of a judge in a courtroom, or the judicial function that belongs properly to that office. It would be illogical to take the broader use of the word and then insist that every occurrence of judge<\/strong> in Scripture must therefore mean nothing more than \u201canalyze\u201d or \u201cascertain.\u201d The same is the case with the word “ransom”.<\/p>\n

            \n

            9. Patristic Confirmation<\/h2>\n

            The Fathers reflect this same pattern. They do not treat ransom as a generic or broad metaphor. They connect it with sacrifice, substitution, payment of a debt, and Christ\u2019s self-offering to God. St. Athanasius says that because all were under penalty and sentence of death, Christ gave His body over to death in the stead of all<\/strong> and offered it to the Father<\/strong>.\u00a0St. Cyril of Alexandria says that Christ offered Himself for all as a ransom to God the Father<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

            St. Irenaeus explains why this makes sense:<\/p>\n

            For we were debtors<\/strong>\u00a0to none other but to Him whose commandment we had transgressed<\/strong>\u2026He has destroyed the handwriting\u201d of our\u00a0debt<\/strong>, and \u201cfastened it to the cross (Against Heresies – Book V, Chapter 16)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

            That point is decisive. If the debt is Godward, then ransom language cannot honestly be stripped of all Godward reference.<\/p>\n

            In the more disputed passage, St. Gregory Nazianzen asks, \u201cTo Whom was that Blood offered that was shed for us, and why was It shed?\u201d and then rejects crude ways of speaking, especially the notion that the devil possessed a rightful commercial claim. Yet even there Gregory still calls Christ\u2019s blood the blood of our \u201cGod and High Priest and Sacrifice,\u201d<\/strong> and says that \u201cthe Father accepts Him.\u201d<\/strong> Read together, these statements do not abolish ransom theology. They guard it from distortion while preserving sacrifice, expiation, and the Godward character of Christ\u2019s saving work.<\/p>\n

            \n

            Conclusion<\/h2>\n

            The biblical idea of ransom is richer than a bare synonym for rescue. Scripture uses the language of ransom and redemption where life stands under claim, where release requires something to be given, and where substitution or payment secures that release.<\/p>\n

            Old Testament Scripture is full of the concept of ransom, exchange, and substitution of life to redeem another life, all within the context of offering, sacrifice, or payment\u2014sometimes even financial\u2014required by God and offered to God. The census ransom, the redemption of the firstborn, and the firstborn donkey redeemed by a lamb all make this plain. They teach us that ransom is not an empty word. It is bound up with life, claim, substitution, and release.<\/p>\n

            And all of these patterns lead us to Christ. We were the ones who stood in need of redemption. We were the unclean. We were the ones who could not redeem ourselves. Christ, the true Lamb, gave Himself for us so that we might be spared.<\/p>\n

            There is also spiritual benefit in meditating on this mystery. When temptation to sin creeps in, the remembrance that Christ paid a costly ransom for our redemption\u2014that we were \u201cbought at a price\u201d<\/strong>\u2014awakens gratitude toward the Savior and shame at the thought of returning to the sin from which He redeemed us. To remember the ransom is not only to understand doctrine more clearly, but also to love Christ more deeply and to despise sin more sincerely.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

            The Lord Jesus Christ says that the Son of Man came \u201cto give his life a ransom for many\u201d (Mark…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3596,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":true,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[246,27,16,45],"tags":[4,252,23,248,249,13,247,5,251,250],"class_list":["post-3579","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-bible","category-patristics","category-salvation","category-spiritual","tag-atonement","tag-atonement-theories","tag-church-fathers","tag-new-testament","tag-old-testament","tag-penal-substitution","tag-ransom","tag-redemption","tag-sacrifice","tag-scripture"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3579","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3579"}],"version-history":[{"count":21,"href":"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3579\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3603,"href":"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3579\/revisions\/3603"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3596"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3579"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3579"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/myagpeya.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3579"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}